Current:Home > ScamsKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -Infinite Edge Learning
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-13 17:07:38
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (416)
Related
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- Pete Alonso apologizes for throwing first hit ball into stands: 'I feel like a piece of crap'
- Talks between regional bloc and Niger’s junta yield little, an official tells The Associated Press
- Gambling spectators yell at Max Homa, Chris Kirk during play at BMW Championship
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Planning a long-haul flight? Here's how to outsmart jet lag
- Those without homes 'most at risk of dying' from Hurricane Hilary in SoCal, advocates warn
- 3 dead, 6 wounded in shooting at a hookah lounge in south Seattle; no word on suspects
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- England vs. Spain: Time, odds, how to watch and live stream 2023 World Cup final
Ranking
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- Look Hot and Stay Cool With Summer Essentials Picked by Real Housewives of Atlanta's Kandi Burruss
- 2023 World Cup awards: Spain's Bonmati wins Golden Ball, Japan's Miyazawa wins Golden Boot
- Nissan recalling more than 236,000 cars to fix a problem that can cause loss of steering control
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- School's starting — but many districts don't have enough bus drivers for their students
- As college football season arrives, schools pay monitors to stop players and staff from gambling
- From turmoil to triumph, Spain clinches its first Women’s World Cup title with a win over England
Recommendation
Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
Scam artists are posing as Maui charities. Here's how to avoid getting duped.
Britney Spears says in an Instagram video that she is 'shocked' about Sam Asghari filing for divorce
Everything to Know About the Rachel Morin Murder Investigation
How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
A raid on a Kansas newspaper likely broke the law, experts say. But which one?
Aaron Rodgers to make New York Jets debut in preseason finale vs. Giants, per report
Ted Lasso Star Cristo Fernández's Game Day Hosting Guide Will Have Your Guests Cheering for More